Evidence-based approach to street design: a case study of Lucknow (Softcopy is also available) (Record no. 71340)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04133nam a2200205Ia 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 231012s9999 xx 000 0 und d |
| 082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER | |
| Classification number | P TH-2774 |
| Item number | JAI |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Jain, Shubham (PUT21341) |
| 245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Evidence-based approach to street design: a case study of Lucknow (Softcopy is also available) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2023 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | xi,94p. |
| 505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
| Formatted contents note | Table of contents <br/>Undertaking i <br/>Certificate iii <br/>Acknowledgments v <br/>Abstract vii <br/>Table of contents ix <br/>List of figures xv <br/>List of tables xi <br/>1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH TOPIC 1 <br/>1.1 Introduction 1 <br/>1.2 Non-Motorized transport 2 <br/>1.2.1 Definition 2 <br/>1.2.2 Modes of Non-Motorized Transport 2 <br/>1.2.3 Benefits of Non-Motorized Transport 2 <br/>2 CONCEPTUAL RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 5 <br/>2.1 Need for Study: 5 <br/>2.2 Aim & Objective: 5 <br/>2.3 DRP Framework 6 <br/>2.4 Methodology 7 <br/>2.5 Scope of Work: 9 <br/>2.6 Limitations 9 <br/>2.7 Research Approach 9 <br/>3 LITERATURE REVIEW 11 <br/>3.1 Literature Review 11 <br/>3.2 Type of Design Guidelines 11 <br/>3.2.1 Definitions 11 <br/>3.2.2 Common Indicators for NMT and Street Design Guidelines 12 <br/>3.3 Indian Street Design Standards and Guidelines 13 <br/>3.3.1 National Guidelines 13 <br/>3.3.2 Localised guidelines 14 <br/>3.3.3 Summary of the key takeaways from the street design guidelines 16 <br/>3.4 Cross Sectional Elements 18 <br/>3.4.1 Footpaths 18 <br/>3.4.2 Multi Utility Zone 19 <br/>3.4.3 Cycle Track 19 <br/>3.4.4 Travel Lane 20 <br/>3.4.5 Parking Lane 20 <br/>3.4.6 Service Lane 20 <br/>3.4.7 Median 21 <br/>3.5 Principles of Street Design Guideline 22 <br/>3.6 Infrastructure Audit Framework 23 <br/>3.6.1 Urban Road Safety Audit (URSA), MoHUA 2012 24 <br/>3.6.2 NMT Toolkit by ITDP 24 <br/>3.6.3 Selection of Infrastructure audit Framework 24 <br/>3.6.4 NMT infrastructure audit Parameters, URSA 25 <br/>3.6.5 Scoring of Parameters 26 <br/>3.7 Key Takeaways from the Chapter 28 <br/>4 EXISTING SITUATION ANALYSIS 29 <br/>4.1 Lucknow City Profile 29 <br/>4.2 Existing NMT mode share 30 <br/>4.2.1 Availability of Footpaths 30 <br/>4.3 Part 1: NMT Infrastructure Audit 31 <br/>4.4 NMT infrastructure audit Analysis 33 <br/>4.4.1 Availability of Footpath 33 <br/>4.4.2 Footpath Type and Condition 34 <br/>4.4.3 Width of Footpath 35 <br/>4.4.4 Height of Footpath 36 <br/>4.4.5 Availability of Cycle Tracks 37 <br/>4.4.6 Barrier free Footpaths 38 <br/>4.4.7 Universal Accessibility 39 <br/>4.4.8 Location of Manholes 40 <br/>4.4.9 Availability of Street Lights 41 <br/>4.4.10 Availability of Crossings 42 <br/>4.4.11 Landscaping features in Footpath 43 <br/>4.5 Overall Infrastructure score of the city 44 <br/>4.5.1 Pedestrian infrastructure in the city 44 <br/>4.5.2 Cycling infrastructure in the city 46 <br/>4.5.3 Overall NMT Infrastructure of the city 48 <br/>4.6 NMT Audit Takeaways 48 <br/>4.7 Part 2: User Survey Analysis – Walking and Cycling 49 <br/>4.7.1 Walk Trip Analysis 50 <br/>4.7.2 Cycle Trips Analysis 56 <br/>4.8 NMT User Survey Takeaways 61 <br/>4.9 Key Takeaways from the Chapter 62 <br/>5 DESIGN PROPOSAL 63 <br/>5.1 Methodology for Selection of Priority areas 63 <br/>5.1.1 Selection of Priority areas 63 <br/>5.1.2 Selected network and locations 65 <br/>5.2 Arterial Road - Representative of Industrial area 66 <br/>5.2.1 Design Proposal 67 <br/>5.3 Sub arterial Road - Representative of Mixed-Use area. 69 <br/>5.3.1 Design Proposal 70 <br/>5.4 Distributor Road - Representative of Residential area 72 <br/>5.4.1 Design Proposal 73 <br/>5.5 Distributor Road - Representative of Institutional area 74 <br/>5.5.1 Design Proposal 75 <br/>5.6 Access Road - Representative of intensive pedestrian street 77 <br/>5.6.1 Design Proposal 78 <br/>5.7 Proposed Street Component Matrix 79 <br/>5.7.1 Road hierarchy of audited network 79 <br/>5.7.2 Matrix 81 <br/>5.8 Phasing of Identified Priority Street Network 84 <br/>6 CONCLUSION 87 <br/>References 89 <br/>Appendix 1: NMT INFRASTRUCTURE AUDIT 92<br/> |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Bhakuni, Nitika (Guide) |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Jain, Himani (Guide) |
| 890 ## - Country | |
| Country | India |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | 2021 Batch |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | Faculty of Planning |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | FP-PG |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | Urban Transport |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection code | Withdrawn status | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Source of acquisition | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not For Loan | Faculty of Planning | CEPT Library | CEPT Library | 12/10/2023 | Faculty of Planning | P TH-2774 JAI | 025391 | 12/10/2023 | 12/10/2023 | Thesis |