What is right and wrong with public bicycle sharing scheme in India (Softcopy is also available)
Rajput, Vishal Ranjisingh (PG181201)
What is right and wrong with public bicycle sharing scheme in India (Softcopy is also available) - 2020 - 135,31p.
Content
1. Introduction 19
1.1 Need of the study 19
1.2 Problem statement 20
1.3 Aim 20
1.4 Objective 20
1.5 Methodology 20
1.6 Data collection plan 21
1.7 Scope and limitation 22
1.8 Background 23
1.8.1 Global scenario 23
1.8.2 Indian scenario 24
2. Literature review 28
2.1 What is PBS? 28
2.2 Difference between bicycle share and bicycle rental. 28
2.3 Evolution of PBS 29
2.4 Benefits of PBS 29
2.5 How PBS is planned 31
2.6 Components of PBS 32
2.7 Models of Public Bicycle Sharing 34
2.7.1 Type of contract 34
2.7.2 Operating model 34
2.7.3 System parameters of PBS 35
2.7.4 City specific parameters 39
1.9 Summary of literature review 41
1.10 City selection criteria 43
3. Analysis of the Public Bicycle Sharing 45
3.1 Mybyk Ahmedabad 45
3.1.1 City scale analysis 47
3.1.2 User’s survey 49
3.1.3 Aspects of system measurement 53
3.1.4 Evaluation framework 54
3.1.5 Business model 56
3.1.6 Advantages and disadvantages 61
3.1.7 Discussion 62
3.1.8 Issues and challenges for the system 63
3.2 Chartered bike, Surat 64
3.2.1 Users survey 69
3.2.2 Aspects of system measurement 73
3.2.3 Evaluation framework 75
3.2.4 Business model 76
3.2.5 Incentive and penalty model 80
3.2.6 Advantages and disadvantages 81
3.2.7 Discussion 82
3.2.8 Challenges for the system and users 82
3.3 Chartered bike, Ranchi 83
3.3.1 User’s survey 87
3.3.2 System measurement aspects 90
3.3.3 Evaluation framework 92
3.3.4 Business model 93
3.3.5 Incentive and penalty model 98
3.3.6 Advantages and disadvantages 99
3.3.7 Discussion 100
3.3.8 Challenges for operator and users 100
3.4 Gbike Gandhinagar 101
3.4.1 User’s survey 104
3.4.2 Aspects of system measurement 107
3.4.3 Evaluation framework 109
3.4.4 Business model 110
3.4.5 Advantages and disadvantages 114
3.4.6 Discussion 115
3.4.7 Challenges for the operator and users 115
4. Comparison 117
5. Recommendations 124
6. Conclusion and future research direction 127
7. Reference 128
A. Appendix-01: Operator questionnaire 131
B. Appendix-02: User’s survey questionnaire 135
P TH-2513 / RAJ
What is right and wrong with public bicycle sharing scheme in India (Softcopy is also available) - 2020 - 135,31p.
Content
1. Introduction 19
1.1 Need of the study 19
1.2 Problem statement 20
1.3 Aim 20
1.4 Objective 20
1.5 Methodology 20
1.6 Data collection plan 21
1.7 Scope and limitation 22
1.8 Background 23
1.8.1 Global scenario 23
1.8.2 Indian scenario 24
2. Literature review 28
2.1 What is PBS? 28
2.2 Difference between bicycle share and bicycle rental. 28
2.3 Evolution of PBS 29
2.4 Benefits of PBS 29
2.5 How PBS is planned 31
2.6 Components of PBS 32
2.7 Models of Public Bicycle Sharing 34
2.7.1 Type of contract 34
2.7.2 Operating model 34
2.7.3 System parameters of PBS 35
2.7.4 City specific parameters 39
1.9 Summary of literature review 41
1.10 City selection criteria 43
3. Analysis of the Public Bicycle Sharing 45
3.1 Mybyk Ahmedabad 45
3.1.1 City scale analysis 47
3.1.2 User’s survey 49
3.1.3 Aspects of system measurement 53
3.1.4 Evaluation framework 54
3.1.5 Business model 56
3.1.6 Advantages and disadvantages 61
3.1.7 Discussion 62
3.1.8 Issues and challenges for the system 63
3.2 Chartered bike, Surat 64
3.2.1 Users survey 69
3.2.2 Aspects of system measurement 73
3.2.3 Evaluation framework 75
3.2.4 Business model 76
3.2.5 Incentive and penalty model 80
3.2.6 Advantages and disadvantages 81
3.2.7 Discussion 82
3.2.8 Challenges for the system and users 82
3.3 Chartered bike, Ranchi 83
3.3.1 User’s survey 87
3.3.2 System measurement aspects 90
3.3.3 Evaluation framework 92
3.3.4 Business model 93
3.3.5 Incentive and penalty model 98
3.3.6 Advantages and disadvantages 99
3.3.7 Discussion 100
3.3.8 Challenges for operator and users 100
3.4 Gbike Gandhinagar 101
3.4.1 User’s survey 104
3.4.2 Aspects of system measurement 107
3.4.3 Evaluation framework 109
3.4.4 Business model 110
3.4.5 Advantages and disadvantages 114
3.4.6 Discussion 115
3.4.7 Challenges for the operator and users 115
4. Comparison 117
5. Recommendations 124
6. Conclusion and future research direction 127
7. Reference 128
A. Appendix-01: Operator questionnaire 131
B. Appendix-02: User’s survey questionnaire 135
P TH-2513 / RAJ