000 04485nam a2200181Ia 4500
008 110101s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und||
082 _aCEM TH-0395
_bSHA
100 _aSharma, Nimish (PG190619)
_990277
245 0 _aApplication of set-based design to investigate value generation in greenfield indian construction projects (Softcopy is also available)
260 _c2021
300 _axix,141p.
505 _aTABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT i UNDERTAKING iii CERTIFICATE v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii NOMENCLATURE x LIST OF FIGURES xvii LIST OF TABLES xix CHAPTER-1: INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Need for the study 2 1.2 Objectives 4 1.3 Scope of the work 4 1.4 Methodology 4 1.5 Timeline of activities 6 1.6 Contribution 6 CHAPTER-2: LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2.1 The construction design process 8 2.2 Construction design life-cycle 9 2.3 Design management 12 2.2.1 Challenges in design management and its implementation 13 2.3 Lean in Design Management 15 2.4 Waste in Design process due to Point-based design 17 2.5 Set-Based Design 19 2.5.1 Current Application of SBD in AEC industry 20 2.6 Research gaps 22 CHAPTER-3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 24 3.1 What is Action Research 24 3.2 Why Action Research 25 3.3 Cyclic Stages of Action Research Methodology adopted 26 3.3.1 Establishing Research Environment 27 3.3.2 Diagnosing 29 3.3.3 Action Planning 29 3.3.4 Action Taking 29 3.3.5 Evaluating 30 3.3.6 Specifying Learning 30 3.4 Framework adopted for the current research 30 3.5 Summary of the adopted research methodology 33 CHAPTER-4: DATA COLLECTION 36 4.1 Diagnosing 36 4.1.1 Semi-Structured Interviews with the Project stakeholders 36 4.1.2 Semi-Structured Interviews with the other Design Experts 40 4.2 Action Planning 43 4.2.1 Project – I (M/s Hilux Auto-electric Pvt. Ltd.) Studio line design 43 4.2.2 Project – II (M/S HERO E-Cycles Pvt. Ltd.) Studio line design 45 4.2.3 Project – III (Residence at N-246, Greater Kailash-I) Design Consortia 47 4.3 Action Taking 49 4.3.1 Project – I (M/s Hilux Auto-electric Pvt. Ltd.) Studio line design 50 4.3.2 Project – II (M/S HERO E-Cycles Pvt. Ltd.) Studio line design 54 4.3.3 Project – III (Residence at N-246, Greater Kailash-I) Design Consortia 59 CHAPTER-5: DATA ANALYSIS 64 Evaluation 64 5.1.1 Data Analysis of the Semi-Structured Interviews using Thematic analysis 64 5.1.2 Evaluation of SBD implementation in organizational settings 73 5.2 Specifying Learnings 76 5.2.1 Learnings about Success and Advantage of SBD implementation 76 5.2.2 Learnings of Challenges faced in SBD implementation 77 5.2.3 SBD implementation Framework for Construction Projects 77 CHAPTER-6: CONCLUSION 80 6.1 Achievement of Research Objectives 80 6.2 Research Limitations 81 6.3 Future Scope of work 82 REFERENCES 84 APPENDIX 94 Appendix-I: Transcripts of Semi-structured Interviews with Project Stakeholders 94 1. Interview with Architectural design consultant – Studio Line Design Pvt. Ltd. 94 2. Interview with Architectural design consultant – Design Consortia 98 3. Interview with Structural consultant – Beniwal Associates Pvt. Ltd. 101 Appendix-II: Transcripts of Semi-structured Interviews with DESIGN EXPERTS 103 1. Interview with Design Expert – Loughborough University 103 2. Interview with Design Expert – Texan A&M University 107 3. Interview with Design Expert – GMR-DIAL 113 4. Interview with Design Expert – Colliers International 119 5. Interview with Design Expert – Crisil 124 Appendix-III: Thematic analysis output 132 Thematic analysis theme-1 (Challenges of point-based design) 132 Thematic analysis theme-2 (Value propositions) 133 Thematic analysis theme-3 (Challenges of implementing sbd) 135 Thematic analysis theme-4 (Overview and advantages of sbd) 136 Thematic analysis theme-5 (Tools to facilitate SBD) 138 Thematic analysis theme-6 (BIM-SBD integration) 139 Thematic analysis theme-7 (Project type for SBD implementation) 139 Thematic analysis theme-8 (Design trade) 140 Thematic analysis theme-9 (Stakeholders that drive SBD) 141 Thematic analysis theme-10 (Design stages followed by Indian firms) 141
700 _aDevkar, Ganesh (Guide)
890 _aIndia
891 _a2019 Batch
891 _aConstruction Engineering and Management
891 _aFT-PG
999 _c69573
_d69573