000 | 04656nam a2200181Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c68222 _d68222 |
||
008 | 201105s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
082 |
_aP TH-2435 _bMAK |
||
100 |
_aMakdani, Aarohi Manoj (PG180001) _984071 |
||
245 | 0 | _aExploring opportunities for inclusive development of world heritage cities : case of Ahmedabad (Softcopy is also available) | |
260 | _c2020 | ||
300 | _axvi,112,24p. | ||
505 | _aContents Undertaking i Certificate iii Acknowledgments v Abstract i Table of contents ix List of figures xiiiv List of tables xv List of maps xv 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Defining cultural heritage and inclusivity 3 Research background 4 Problem statement 4 Aim and objectives5 1.4.1 Aim 5 Objectives 5 Research Questions 5 Research methodology 5 Mapping perceptions and debates around World Heritage tag 6 Mapping socio – economic character of walled city residents 6 Mapping awareness levels among residents Devising strategies for community inclusive development 7 Scope and limitations Structure of report Reviewing existing literature Research methodology for primary survey and findings 8 Case studies 8 Recommendations and conclusion 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 11 Introduction 11 UNESCO criteria for World Heritage Listing 12 Criteria for selection of Ahmedabad on the list 12 Benefits of World Heritage listing for a site 13 Economic benefits 13 Social benefits 13 Past heritage conservation efforts in Ahmedabad 14 Reviewing UNESCO nomination dossier 15 Current heritage conservation model – Ahmedabad 16 Ahmedabad’s social awareness and community participation 16 Critical reflections on Ahmedabad’s World Heritage inscription 17 Benefits and costs imposed due to inscription 18 Challenges faced by the residents 19 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR PRIMARY SURVEY 23 Approach 23 Sampling strategy . 23 Selection of study area and samples 23 Selection of Khadia II as study area 23 Selection of pols 24 Selection of samples within pols 25 Stakeholders consulted 25 Qualitative and Quantitative data collected for primary survey 26 4 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY AREA 29 4.1 Introduction: Setting the context 29 4.2 Significance of Khadia II as study area 4.3 Selection criteria of pols within Khadia II 30 4.4 Methodology and questionnaire 30 4.5 Importance of residents’ perceptions in conserving heritage 31 5 STUDY AREA – SURVEY AND ANALYSIS 35 5.1 Introduction to survey pols 35 5.1.1 Location of the pol 35 5.1.2 Heritage Grade Map 35 5.1.3 Visual analysis of the pol 36 5.1.4 Survey sampling for household survey 36 5.2 Selection of survey indicators 41 5.2.1 Survey sampling 42 5.2.2 Profile of respondents 42 5.3 Survey findings and analysis 42 5.3.1 Mapping and analysing social character 42 5.3.2 Mapping Economic character 46 5.3.3 Mapping relation between grades, income and condition 53 5.3.4 Mapping awareness levels among residents 56 5.4 Summarizing survey results 61 5.4.1 Shyamla ni pol 62 5.4.2 Dhal ni pol 62 5.4.3 Nagarbodi ni pol 63 5.5 Need for interventions based on survey findings 63 6 CASE STUDY 67 6.1 Hill forts of Rajasthan 67 6.2 Hoi An ancient Town, Vietnam 69 6.2.1 Income re-distribution model 70 6.3 Lunenburg, Canada 72 6.3.1 Heritage conservation in Lunenburg 72 6.3.2 Strategic Plan – Town of Lunenburg 73 7 FINDINGS AND PROPOSALS 77 7.3 Key findings 77 7.4 Proposals 78 7.2.1 Strategy 1: Preparing institutional framework 79 7.2.2 Strategy 2: Develop communication sharing platforms 80 7.2.3 Strategy 3: Financial strategies for tangible heritage assets 81 7.2.4 Strategy 4: Support and enhance livelihoods 91 7.3 Conclusion 93 7.4 Way forward 94 8 Bibliography 95 9 Annexure 1 99 9.2 Questionnaire for Household survey 99 9.3 Questionnaire for Government agencies 102 9.4 Questionnaire for NGOs 103 10 Annexure 2 105 10.2 HTDR application form and process 105 | ||
700 |
_aBandyopadhyay, Saswat (Guide) _987090 |
||
890 | _aIndia | ||
891 | _a2018 Batch | ||
891 | _aFP-PG | ||
891 | _aMaster of Urban Planning |