000 | 02016nam a2200157Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 180517s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und|| | ||
082 |
_aM.Arch TH-0105 _bKHA |
||
100 | _aKhan, Sabrina | ||
245 | 0 | _aEstablishing an active dialogue between new urbanity and historic precincts through planning and design (Also available on CD) | |
260 | _c2017 | ||
300 | _a6,143,ixxxp.,CD-ROM | ||
505 | _aCONTENTS ABSTRACT Acknowledgments CONTENTS List of figures List of tables PREFACE Chapter 1// ACTIVE DIALOGUES 1.1 Background 1.2 significance of the study 1.3 Aims and Objectives 1.4 Research Questions 1.5 Scope and Limitations Chapter 2// LIKE ANY OTHER URBANSCAPE 2.1 Warangal: The City, The Historicity and the Growth 2.1.1 The City 2.1.2 Historicity 2.1.3. Growth 2.2 Site Selection 2.3 HRIDAY at Warangal City 2.4 Site at Fort Warangal 2.4.1 HRIDAY at Fort Warangal 2.4.2 HRIDAY Interventions 2.4.3 Other Operational Agendas at the Fort 2.4.4 Designated property at the Fort 2.5 Site Analysis 2.6 Site Situation/ Inferences 2.7 A Peculiar Situation Chapter 3// THE FUNDAMENTALIST APPROACH: CONTINUITY AND ANACHRONISM 3.1 The process of Othering and the colonial legacy The Case of Hampi : A familiar future 3.2 Archeologising Heritage and Living Heritage Chapter 4// THE BIG IDEA 4.1 The Conceptual Design Exercise 4.2 The Failure 4.3 The Design Ideology// TACUIP 4.4 The Design Tool 4.5 The Concept of the Rural- Urban Transect by Duany-Plater Zyberk Chapter 5// FORT INTERVENTION 5.1 Application of the Tool to the site at Fort Warangal 5.2 Limitations of the Tool Chapter 6// A REACTION TO HRIDAY 6.1 A catalogue of commitments 6.2 The Loss and Retrieval// Recommendations References Bibliography Appendices A1. Appendix 1/ Site Surveys A Establishment survey B Household Survey C Focus group discussion points D Questions to Tourists E Self Assessment/ Participant Observation | ||
700 | _aDesai, Jigna (Guide) | ||
891 | _a2015 Batch | ||
891 | _aFA-PG | ||
999 |
_c53083 _d53083 |