000 02557nam a2200169Ia 4500
008 180517s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und||
082 _aM.Arch TH-0084
_bKHA
100 _aKhasiya, Krushnkumar
245 0 _aDevelopment process for rural urban fringe : proposal for commoning as fulcrum of growth (Also available on CD)
260 _c2017
300 _a96p.,CD-ROM
505 _aCONTENTS Abstract Acknowledgements st of Tables List of Figures 1. Research Brief 1.1. Introduction 1.2. Premise 1.3. Need for Study 1.4. Research Question 1.5. Aim 1.6. Objectives 1.7. Methodology 1.8. Scope and Limitations 2. Rural-Urban Fringe 2.1. Introduction of Rural-Urban Fringe 2.2. Delimitation and Structure of the Rural-Urban Fringe 2.3. Characteristics of Rural-Urban Fringe 2.4. Transformation of Rural-Urban Fringe 2.5. Role of actors in Process of Growth of Rural-Urban Fringe 3. Conventional manner of Development Process 3.1. Introduction to Conventional manner of Development Process 3.2. Land Speculation 3.2.1. Adverse Effects of Land Speculation 3.3. Process of Appropriation 3.3.1. Development Plan 3.3.2. Adverse impacts of Appropriation 3.4. Alienation 3.5. Adverse Impacts on the Rural-Urban Fringe due to Development Process 4. Alternative Approaches Demonstrated 4.1. Alternative Approaches Demonstrated at Design Level 4.2. Alternative Approaches Demonstrated at Policy level 4.3. Summary of Alternative approaches 4.4. New alternative approach by Commons 5. Commons and Commoning 5.1. The Idea of Commons 5.2. Time-line of Use of Commons 5.3. Commons and CPR and Public Goods 5.3.1. Commons vs. CPR 5.3.2. Commons vs. Public Goods 5.4. Commoning 5.4.1. Structure of Commoning 5.5. Need of Commoning as part of Institutional Mechanism 5.6. Extraction from Case Study - Bangalore Lakes 6. New Proposal for Development Process with Commoning 6.1. Introduction 6.2. Strengthening of Rural Livelihood 6.2.1. Agricultural system as Strong Economical Base 6.2.2. Self-sufficient Infrastructural system 6.2.3. Network of Interdependency 6.3. Development Direction 6.4. Implementation by Integrating Locality 6.5. Discussion on Proposed Alternative Approach 6.5.1. Creating the scenario to avoid the existing Rural-Urban Fringe problems to occur 6.5.2. Dovetail with other Reforms like P.U.R.A. 6.5.3. Strengthening of Democratic principles through Commoning 6.5.4. Advantages for Physical Urban Form 7. Conclusion References Appendices
700 _aDesai, Urvi (Guide)
891 _a2015 Batch
891 _aFA-PG
891 _aLandscape Architecture
999 _c53062
_d53062