000 05298nam a22001695i 4500
008 130627s2013 dcu 000 0 eng
020 _a9780309283427
082 _a388
_bVIS
100 _aVisual risk technologies, Inc.
245 0 0 _aHazardous materials transportation risk assessment :
_bstate of the practice
260 _aWashington D.C.
_bTransportation Research Board
_c2013
300 _ax,114p.
440 _aHazardous materials cooperative research program
_vHMCRP Report No.12
500 _a1 Summary 4 Section 1 Introduction 5 Section 2 Description of the Research Approach 5 2.1 Literature Review 5 2.1.1 Identification 5 2.1.2 Compilation 6 2.2 Interview and Online Survey Procedures 7 Section 3 Current Uses 7 3.1 General Literature Results 7 3.1.1 New Modeling Techniques and Approaches 8 3.1.2 Data-Driven Risk Assessment 8 3.1.3 The Use of Risk Analysis and Route Choice 8 3.1.4 Economic Risk Analysis 8 3.2 Carriers 8 3.2.1 Association of American Railroads (AAR) 9 3.2.2 Class I Railroad 10 3.3 Shippers 10 3.3.1 Large Chemical Manufacturer #1 11 3.3.2 Large Chemical Manufacturer #2 12 3.3.3 Institute of Makers of Explosives 13 3.3.4 Large Chemical/Plastics Manufacturer 14 3.4 Federal Agencies 14 3.4.1 Department of Energy 16 3.4.2 Department of Transportation 20 3.4.3 Department of Homeland Security 22 3.5 State Agencies 22 3.5.1 California Emergency Management Agency 22 3.5.2 State Transportation Department 23 3.6 International Organizations 23 3.6.1 Transport Dangerous Goods (Transport Canada) 23 3.6.2 Foreign Security Agency 24 3.6.3 Public Foreign Research Organization 25 3.7 Consulting and Research Organizations 25 3.7.1 ABS Consulting 26 3.7.2 Booz Alien Hamilton 26 3.7.3 Engineering Systems Inc. (ESI) 26 3.7.4 Private Consulting Firm 27 3.7.5 Private Consultant 27 3.7.6 National Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of TerrorismEvents (CREATE) 27 3.7.7 National Pipeline Safety and Operations Research Center 28 3.7.8 Security Analysis and Risk Management Association (S ARM A) 29 3.7.9 The Kentucky Transportation Center (KTC) at the University of Kentucky 29 3.7.10 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) 31 Section 4 Characterization 31 4.1 Decision Matrices 32 4.1.1 Mode Choice 34 4.1.2 Route Choice 39 4.1.3 Facility Siting 41 4.1.4 Packaging Selection 43 4.1.5 Alternate Product Selection 44 4.1.6 Emergency Management Resource Planning 46 4.1.7 Operational Changes 49 4.1.8 Security Measure Identification, Prioritization, and Evaluation 51 4.1.9 Security Risk Situational Awareness 52 4.2 Model Matrices 53 4.2.1 Boston Hazmat Route Evaluation 54 4.2.2 CCPS Guidelines: Qualitative Risk Assessment Process 55 4.2.3 CCPS Guidelines: Quantitative Risk Assessment Process 56 4.2.4 CCPS Guidelines: Risk Prioritization Process 57 4.2.5 CCPS Guidelines: Security Risk Prioritization Process 58 4.2.6 CCPS Guidelines: Security Vulnerability Assessment Process 59 4.2.7 CCPS Guidelines: Semi-Quantitative Risk Assessment Process 60 4.2.8 Chemical Manufacturer Risk Assessment Framework 61 4.2.9 Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) Process 62 4.2.10 Fedtrak 63 4.2.11 GeoCTA 64 4.2.12 IME Safety Analysis for Risk (IMESAFR) 65 4.2.13 Pipeline Risk Management Manual Risk Assessment Method 66 4.2.14 RADTRAN 67 4.2.15 Rail Corridor Risk Management System (RCRMS) 69 4.2.16 Readiness and Resiliency Assessment System 69 4.2.17 Risk-Based Preventative Radiological/Nuclear Detection Resource Allocation (CREATE Model) 70 4.2.18 TRACC 71 4.2.19 Transportation Routing Analysis CIS (TRAGIS) 72 4.2.20 Transportation Sector Security Risk Assessment (TSSRA) 73 4.2.21 Trucking and Hazmat Trucking Risk Assessment (THTRA) 74 4.2.22 UIUC Tank Car Risk Analysis 76 Section S Analysis and Recommendations 76 5.1 General Analysis 76 5.1.1 Types of Decisions 78 5.1.2 Model Components 82 5.1.3 Interpreting and Applying Results 83 5.2 Gaps 83 5.2.1 Gaps in Models for Decisions 83 5.2.2 Gaps in Data for Models 85 5.2.3 Gaps in Model, Data, or Results Availability 86 5.3 Recommended Paths Forward 86 5.3.1 Recommendations for Model Development 87 5.3.2 Recommendations for Data Development 87 5.3.3 Recommendations for Communication and Data/Model Sharing 88 Appendix A Literature Review Results 99 Appendix B List of Organizations Contacted 102 Appendix C Phone Scripts and Email Templates 104 Appendix D Interview Questionnaire 109 Appendix E Online Survey Invitation 110 Appendix F On-Line Survey 111 Acronyms and Abbreviations
890 _aUnited States
891 _aGRATIS
_aCEPT-COE-UTPM
999 _c38138
_d38138