Image from Google Jackets

Impact of decision making on BRTS implementation : comparing experiences in Ahmedabad and Indore (Softcopy is also available)

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublication details: 2018Description: xxiii,161,clxii-clxixpDDC classification:
  • Ph.D. TH-0065 LOK
Contents:
CONTENTS Certificate of original authorship vii Certificate of Dissertation Advisor’s consent ix Acknowledgments xi Abstract xiii List of figures xv List of tables xix List of abbreviations xxi 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Introduction to cases 6 1.3 Decision making models 7 1.4 Research objectives 9 1.5 Dissertation outline 9 2 RECONCEPTUALIZING DECISION MAKING 11 2.1 Decision making process 11 2.2 Research questions 12 2.3 Methodology 13 2.3.1 Case study methodology 13 2.4 Case selection 16 2.5 Field work and data collection 18 3 DECISION MAKING AND RISK IN BRTS 21 3.1 Decision making 21 3.1.1 Rational model 22 3.1.2 Behavioural model 24 3.2 Basis of decision making 27 3.3 Risk, risk analysis and risk management 28 3.4 Environment in decision making 31 3.5 The ‘Hiding Hand Principle’32 3.6 Decision making in public administration34 3.7 Who were the decision makers? 35 4 BRTS IN INDIA 39 4.1 Background . 39 4.2 BRTS elements 39 4.3 JnNURM and NUTP 43 4.4 BRTS status in India 44 4.5 Defining success 50 4.5.1 Reasons for success. 51 4.6 Decisions in BRTS 53 4.6.1 Critical decisions 54 4.7 Conditions for successful project implementation 66 4.8 The decision making context. 68 5 JANMARG: AHMEDABAD’S BRTS 69 5.1 Introduction 69 5.2 Project context 70 5.3 The situation before 2005 74 5.3.1 AMTS and its struggle75 5.3.2 The IPTS 77 5.3.3 The plan for the metro 78 5.4 Analysing decisions 81 5.4.1 Choosing BRTS as an option 81 5.4.2 Selecting the consultant 84 5.4.3 The implementation authority 86 5.4.4 Finalising the first corridor 90 5.4.5 Finalising system type 94 5.4.6 Changing the bus station location 97 5.4.7 The business model 99 5.5 Implementation and operations103 5.6 Current issues 105 5.7 Future plans 106 5.8 Continuity in decision making 106 6 iBUS: INDORE’S BRTS 109 6.1 Background 109 6.2 Project context 110 6.3 The situation before 2005 113 6.4 A new bus system 115 6.4.1 Issues with ICTSL 117 6.5 Analysing decisions 118 6.5.1 Choosing BRTS as an option 118 6.5.2 Selecting the consultant 119 6.5.3 The implementing authority124 6.5.4 Finalising the first corridor 125 6.5.5 Changing the bus station location 130 6.5.6 Finalising system type 132 6.5.7 The business model 133 6.6 The legal tussle 137 6.7 Implementation and operations 139 6.8 Continuity in decision making 140 7 COMPARING EXPERIENCES 145 7.1 The importance of environment in decision making 145 7.2 Windows of opportunities and impact on project outcomes 146 7.3 The response to unexpected situations 148 7.4 Continuity in decision making 149 7.5 How were decisions made? 151 8 CONCLUSIONS 153 8.1 General observations 153 8.2 Assessing research questions 155 8.3 A new model of decision making? 157 8.4 The experts versus decision makers 159 8.5 Contribution to science 160 8.6 Further research 160 References clxiii Annexure 1 clxix
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Thesis CEPT Library Doctoral Programs Ph.D. TH-0065 LOK Not for loan 018853
Total holds: 0

CONTENTS
Certificate of original authorship vii
Certificate of Dissertation Advisor’s consent ix
Acknowledgments xi
Abstract xiii
List of figures xv
List of tables xix
List of abbreviations xxi
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Introduction to cases 6
1.3 Decision making models 7
1.4 Research objectives 9
1.5 Dissertation outline 9
2 RECONCEPTUALIZING DECISION MAKING 11
2.1 Decision making process 11
2.2 Research questions 12
2.3 Methodology 13
2.3.1 Case study methodology 13
2.4 Case selection 16
2.5 Field work and data collection 18
3 DECISION MAKING AND RISK IN BRTS 21
3.1 Decision making 21
3.1.1 Rational model 22
3.1.2 Behavioural model 24
3.2 Basis of decision making 27
3.3 Risk, risk analysis and risk management 28
3.4 Environment in decision making 31
3.5 The ‘Hiding Hand Principle’32
3.6 Decision making in public administration34
3.7 Who were the decision makers? 35
4 BRTS IN INDIA 39
4.1 Background . 39
4.2 BRTS elements 39
4.3 JnNURM and NUTP 43
4.4 BRTS status in India 44
4.5 Defining success 50
4.5.1 Reasons for success. 51
4.6 Decisions in BRTS 53
4.6.1 Critical decisions 54
4.7 Conditions for successful project implementation 66
4.8 The decision making context. 68
5 JANMARG: AHMEDABAD’S BRTS 69
5.1 Introduction 69
5.2 Project context 70
5.3 The situation before 2005 74
5.3.1 AMTS and its struggle75
5.3.2 The IPTS 77
5.3.3 The plan for the metro 78
5.4 Analysing decisions 81
5.4.1 Choosing BRTS as an option 81
5.4.2 Selecting the consultant 84
5.4.3 The implementation authority 86
5.4.4 Finalising the first corridor 90
5.4.5 Finalising system type 94
5.4.6 Changing the bus station location 97
5.4.7 The business model 99
5.5 Implementation and operations103
5.6 Current issues 105
5.7 Future plans 106
5.8 Continuity in decision making 106
6 iBUS: INDORE’S BRTS 109
6.1 Background 109
6.2 Project context 110
6.3 The situation before 2005 113
6.4 A new bus system 115
6.4.1 Issues with ICTSL 117
6.5 Analysing decisions 118
6.5.1 Choosing BRTS as an option 118
6.5.2 Selecting the consultant 119
6.5.3 The implementing authority124
6.5.4 Finalising the first corridor 125
6.5.5 Changing the bus station location 130
6.5.6 Finalising system type 132
6.5.7 The business model 133
6.6 The legal tussle 137
6.7 Implementation and operations 139
6.8 Continuity in decision making 140
7 COMPARING EXPERIENCES 145
7.1 The importance of environment in decision making 145
7.2 Windows of opportunities and impact on project outcomes 146
7.3 The response to unexpected situations 148
7.4 Continuity in decision making 149
7.5 How were decisions made? 151
8 CONCLUSIONS 153
8.1 General observations 153
8.2 Assessing research questions 155
8.3 A new model of decision making? 157
8.4 The experts versus decision makers 159
8.5 Contribution to science 160
8.6 Further research 160
References clxiii
Annexure 1 clxix

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Excel To HTML using codebeautify.org Sheet Name :- Location Chart
Location Chart Basement 1 (B1) Class No. 600 - 649, 660 - 699
(B1) :Mezzanine 1 Class No. 700 - 728
(B1) :Mezzanine 2 Class No. 728.1 - 799, 650 - 659, Reference Books, Faculty work
Basement 2 (B2) Class No. 000 - 599, 800-999
Basement 3 (B3) (Please Inquire at the Counter for resources) Theses, Students' works, Bound Journals, Drawings, Atlas, Oversize Books, Rare Books, IS codes, Non-book Materials