Development process for rural urban fringe : proposal for commoning as fulcrum of growth (Also available on CD)
Material type: TextPublication details: 2017Description: 96p.,CD-ROMDDC classification:- M.Arch TH-0084 KHA
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis | CEPT Library | Faculty of Architecture | M.Arch TH-0084 KHA | Not for loan | 018236 |
CONTENTS Abstract Acknowledgements st of Tables List of Figures 1. Research Brief 1.1. Introduction 1.2. Premise 1.3. Need for Study 1.4. Research Question 1.5. Aim 1.6. Objectives 1.7. Methodology 1.8. Scope and Limitations 2. Rural-Urban Fringe 2.1. Introduction of Rural-Urban Fringe 2.2. Delimitation and Structure of the Rural-Urban Fringe 2.3. Characteristics of Rural-Urban Fringe 2.4. Transformation of Rural-Urban Fringe 2.5. Role of actors in Process of Growth of Rural-Urban Fringe 3. Conventional manner of Development Process 3.1. Introduction to Conventional manner of Development Process 3.2. Land Speculation 3.2.1. Adverse Effects of Land Speculation 3.3. Process of Appropriation 3.3.1. Development Plan 3.3.2. Adverse impacts of Appropriation 3.4. Alienation 3.5. Adverse Impacts on the Rural-Urban Fringe due to Development Process 4. Alternative Approaches Demonstrated 4.1. Alternative Approaches Demonstrated at Design Level 4.2. Alternative Approaches Demonstrated at Policy level 4.3. Summary of Alternative approaches 4.4. New alternative approach by Commons 5. Commons and Commoning 5.1. The Idea of Commons 5.2. Time-line of Use of Commons 5.3. Commons and CPR and Public Goods 5.3.1. Commons vs. CPR 5.3.2. Commons vs. Public Goods 5.4. Commoning 5.4.1. Structure of Commoning 5.5. Need of Commoning as part of Institutional Mechanism 5.6. Extraction from Case Study - Bangalore Lakes 6. New Proposal for Development Process with Commoning 6.1. Introduction 6.2. Strengthening of Rural Livelihood 6.2.1. Agricultural system as Strong Economical Base 6.2.2. Self-sufficient Infrastructural system 6.2.3. Network of Interdependency 6.3. Development Direction 6.4. Implementation by Integrating Locality 6.5. Discussion on Proposed Alternative Approach 6.5.1. Creating the scenario to avoid the existing Rural-Urban Fringe problems to occur 6.5.2. Dovetail with other Reforms like P.U.R.A. 6.5.3. Strengthening of Democratic principles through Commoning 6.5.4. Advantages for Physical Urban Form 7. Conclusion References Appendices
There are no comments on this title.