Assessing the design parameters influencing the seismic performance of confined Masonry (Softcopy is also available) (Record no. 69689)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02585nam a2200169Ia 4500 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 110102s9999 xx 000 0 und d |
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER | |
Classification number | B TH-0925 |
Item number | JOS |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Joshi, Shivangee (UC7016) |
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Assessing the design parameters influencing the seismic performance of confined Masonry (Softcopy is also available) |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2020-21 |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | vi,51p. |
505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | Index Of Chapters<br/>Certificate Of Approval 3<br/>Acknowledgement 4<br/>Abstract 5<br/>Index Of Chapters 6<br/>List Of Table 9<br/>List Of Figures 10<br/>Notations 11 <br/>Abbreviations 11<br/>Chapter 1: Introduction 12<br/>1.1. Introduction 12<br/>1.2. Need For Study 12<br/>1.3. Objective 12<br/>1.4. Scope 12<br/>1.5. Methodology 13<br/>1.6. Research Timeline 13<br/>1.7. Outline Of The Study 13<br/>Chapter 2: Literature Review 14<br/>2.1. Introduction 14<br/>2.1.1. Performance Of Confined Masonry During Past Earthquakes 14<br/>2.1.2. Major Differences In Cm Technology And Rc Frames 15<br/>2.1.3. Failure Mechanism 16<br/>2.2. Parameters Influencing Seismic Performance Of Cm Walls 16<br/>2.2.1. Wall Density 16<br/>2.2.2. Wall Openings 16<br/>2.2.3. Toothing 16<br/>2.2.4. Aspect Ratio 17<br/>2.2.5. Vertical Confinement (Tie Column) 17<br/>2.2.6. Horizontal Confinement (Tie Beam) 17<br/>2.2.7. Masonry Properties 17<br/>2.3. General Requirements Related To Confined Masonry 17<br/>2.4. Seismic Evaluation Methods 18<br/>2.4.1. Simplified Method 19<br/>2.4.2. Advanced Methods 19<br/>2.4.3. Drawbacks Of Existing Approaches: 19<br/>2.5. Research Gap 20<br/>Chapter 3: Analysis And Results 21<br/>3.1. Problem Statement 21<br/>3.1.1. Building Geometry Of Cm Building 21<br/>3.1.2. Material Properties 21<br/>3.1.3. Seismic Parameters 22<br/>3.1.4. Loads Considered 22<br/>3.2. Manual Calculations 22<br/>3.2.1. Calculation Of Confined Masonry Seismic Weight 22<br/>3.2.2. Calculation Of Base Shear 22<br/>3.2.3. Distribution Of Design Lateral Force 25<br/>3.3. Modelling 25<br/>3.3.1. Masonry Properties 26<br/>3.3.2. Data Of Openings Considered For The Study 28<br/>3.3.3. Data For Confining Schemes Around Openings 29<br/>3.4. Analysis And Results 29<br/>3.4.1. Analysis Results For Various Opening Cases 30<br/>3.4.2. Analysis For Various Confining Schemes 34<br/>Chapter 4: Conclusion 37<br/>4.1. Conclusion 37<br/>4.2. Future Scope Of Study 37<br/>Bibliography 38<br/>Appendix A 39<br/>Building Plan Selected 39<br/>Appendix B 40<br/>Confining Schemes 40<br/>Appendix C 44<br/>Models With Different Opening Percentages 44<br/> |
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Thaker, Parth (Guide) |
890 ## - Country | |
Country | India |
891 ## - Topic | |
Topic | 2016 Batch |
891 ## - Topic | |
Topic | FT-UG |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection code | Withdrawn status | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Source of acquisition | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not For Loan | Faculty of Technology | CEPT Library | CEPT Library | 17/05/2022 | Faculty of Technology | B TH-0925 JOS | 023668 | 17/05/2022 | 17/05/2022 | Thesis |