Bidding process for engineering consultants (Softcopy is also available) (Record no. 69656)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03620nam a2200169Ia 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 110102s9999 xx 000 0 und d
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number B TH-0892
Item number INA
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Inamdar, Purva (UC2216)
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Bidding process for engineering consultants (Softcopy is also available)
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2020-21
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent vi,55p.
505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note Table of Contents <br/>ABSTRACT 4 <br/>Chapter 1: Introduction: 8 <br/>1.1 Background: 8 <br/>1.2 Need for the study: 8 <br/>1.3 Scope of the study: 8 <br/>1.4 Objectives of the study: 9 <br/>1.5 Research methodology adopted: 9 <br/>1.6 Expected outcome from the study: 11 <br/>1.7 Assumptions and limitation for the study: 11 <br/>1.7.1 Assumptions for the study: 11 <br/>1.7.2 Limitations of the study: 11 <br/>1.8 Tentative timeline adopted for the study: 11 <br/>Chapter 2: Literature review: 12 <br/>2.1 Scope and objective of literature review: 12 <br/>2.2 Overall project life cycle and role of consultants: 12 <br/>2.3 Overall process followed by consultants before considering a project/client: 13 <br/>2.4 Summary for probable parameters for making a Bid/No-bid decision for consultants: . 14 <br/>2.5 Overall bidding process followed from clients end: 15 <br/>2.6 Bid evaluation criteria: 15 <br/>2.6.1 Quality based selection (QBS): 15 <br/>2.6.2 Quality Cost Based Selection (QCBS): 16 <br/>2.6.3 Cost Based Selection (CBS): 16 <br/>2.6.4 Single source selection: 16 <br/>2.7 Research gap: 16 <br/>2.9 Research questions: 16 <br/>3. Data collection: 17 <br/>3.1 Overview and methodology: 17 <br/>3.2 Basis and objectives of the questionnaire survey: 17 <br/>3.4 Overview and objectives of semi-structured interviews: 18 <br/>4. Data analysis: 19 <br/>4.1 Overview: 19 <br/>4.2 Age of organisations of respondents: 20 <br/>4.3 Areas of work for the respondants <br/>4.4 Type of process adopted for go/non-go decision: 21 <br/>4.5 RII analysis and ranking of parameters: 22 <br/>4.5.1 Overall RII ranking of parameters: 22 <br/>4.5.2 RII ranking for small scale consultants: 23 <br/>4.5.3 RII ranking for medium scale consultants: 24 <br/>4.5.4 RII ranking for large scale consultant 25 <br/>4.6 Similarity variation analysis for top 15 parameters identified from RII analysis for all the three categories of consultants mentioned: 26 <br/>4.7 Comparison of RII ranking: 27 <br/>4.8 Accuracy of bidding process adopted: 28 <br/>4.9 Analysis for other parameters: 29 <br/>4.10 Percentage distribution for interview respondents: 30 <br/>4.11 ANOVA test: 31 <br/>5.Analysis of Survey Results: 33 <br/>5.1 Top 10 influencing parameters identified by Consultants: 33 <br/>5.1.1 Past payment record of client: 33 <br/>5.1.2 Cash-flow on the project: 33 <br/>5.1.3 Fair conditions of contract: 33 <br/>5.1.4 Clarity in the ToR: 33 <br/>5.1.5 History of the client with the company: 34 <br/>5.1.6 Current financial capacity of the client: 34 <br/>5.1.7 Overall staff expertise: 34 <br/>5.1.8 Revenue generated from previous similar projects: 34 <br/>5.1.9 Reputation of client: 34 <br/>6. Conclusions 35 <br/>6.1 Major inferences: 35 <br/>6.1 Major inferences for small and medium consultants: 35 <br/>6.2 Major inferences for large consultants: 35 <br/>6.3 Major challenges faced in the current bidding process followed: 35 <br/>7. Future scope: 36 <br/>Bibliography 36 <br/>Appendix A (summary for interviews) 37 <br/>Appendix B (Questionnaire survey form) 44 <br/>Appendix C (Summary for questionnaire responses) 51 <br/>1. Classification of consultants: 51 <br/>2. Likert scale responses: 52 <br/>3. Summary for true-false answer: 53<br/>
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Vakil, Suren (Guide)
890 ## - Country
Country India
891 ## - Topic
Topic 2016 Batch
891 ## - Topic
Topic FT-UG
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection code Withdrawn status Home library Current library Date acquired Source of acquisition Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
      Not For Loan Faculty of Technology   CEPT Library CEPT Library 17/05/2022 Faculty of Technology B TH-0892 INA 023635 17/05/2022 17/05/2022 Thesis
Excel To HTML using codebeautify.org Sheet Name :- Location Chart
Location Chart Basement 1 (B1) Class No. 600 - 649, 660 - 699
(B1) :Mezzanine 1 Class No. 700 - 728
(B1) :Mezzanine 2 Class No. 728.1 - 799, 650 - 659, Reference Books, Faculty work
Basement 2 (B2) Class No. 000 - 599, 800-999
Basement 3 (B3) (Please Inquire at the Counter for resources) Theses, Students' works, Bound Journals, Drawings, Atlas, Oversize Books, Rare Books, IS codes, Non-book Materials