| Formatted contents note |
CONTENTS<br/>Declaration 2<br/>Acknowledgement 3<br/>List of Abbreviations 4<br/>List of Figures 6<br/>Executive Summary 8<br/>Chapter: 1 Introduction 13<br/>1.1 Background 13<br/>1.2 Abstract 14<br/>1.3 Problem Statement 15<br/>1.4 Research Questions 18<br/>1.5 Research Objectives 18<br/>1.6 Scope of Work 18<br/>Chapter: 2 Literature Review 19<br/>2.1 “A study on critical factors influencing the infrastructure development projects under public private partnership (Rajkumar, Anandakumar, Ph, Krishnamoorthy, & Phil, 2013)” 19<br/>2.2 “Public-Private Partnership in Indian Infrastructure Development: Issue and Options (Lakshmanan, 2008)” 19<br/>2.3 “Consideration of risk in PPP projects (Zimmermann & Eber, 2014)” 20<br/>2.4 “Optimal risk allocation in public-private partnership (PPP) projects in India (Kakati & Dean, 2016)” 21<br/>2.5 “A Framework to Use Public-Private Partnership for Smart City Projects (Calderini et al., 2013)” 21<br/>2.6 “Rebooting public private partnership in India (Hans, 2017)” 21<br/>2.7 “Efficient risk transfer in PPP wastewater treatment projects (Shrestha, Chan, Aibinu, & Chen, 2017)” 22<br/>2.8 “Public–private partnerships in basic service delivery: impact on the poor, examples from the water sector in India (Dijk, 2008)” 22<br/>2.9 “Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in water and sanitation in India: Lessons from China (Wu, House, & Peri, 2016)” 22<br/>2.10 “Hybrid annuity projects – Risk mitigation for stakeholders? (CARE, 2016)” 23<br/>2.11 “Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) for PPP Projects (Patwardhan, 2016)” 23<br/>2.12 “Request for proposal for development of sewage treatment plants on PPP basis at Haridwar, Uttarakhand (NMCG, 2017)” 23<br/>2.13 “Policy for Reuse of treated waste water, Government of Gujarat; 2018 (Water Supply Department, Government of Gujarat, 2018)” 24<br/>Chapter: 3 Research Methodology 24<br/>Chapter: 4 Research Work . 25<br/>4.1 Case of 245MLD STP at Kabit Khedi, Indore 25<br/>4.2 Difference between traditional contractual agreements and PPPs 28<br/>4.3 Categorization and Comparison of different PPP modes for suitability in sewage treatment infrastructure operations 30<br/>4.4 Identification of apt PPP category for suitability in sewage treatment infrastructure operations 32<br/>4.5 Case of conceptualised 45MLD integrated STP (including tertiary treatment), Rajkot 33<br/>4.6 Risk sharing parameters in contractual agreements of different sewage treatment infrastructure projects 37<br/>4.7 Progressive PPP mode enhancing judicious risk sharing amongst public and private partner (evaluation through literature study) (Patwardhan, 2016), (CARE, 2016) 39<br/>Chapter: 5 Proposed best suited PPP mode for sewage treatment infrastructure operations 44<br/>Chapter: 6 How can a local body (public partner) best facilitate execution of sewage treatment infrastructure projects using the proposed HAM based PPP mode 48<br/>6.1 Case of 40 MLD Tertiary Treatment Plant, Bamroli, Surat 48<br/>6.2 Case of 180MLD STP at Pirana and biogas bottling plant in the same campus, Ahmedabad 50<br/>Chapter: 7 Formulated check-list for efficient execution of sewage treatment infrastructure projects through the proposed HAM based PPP mode 52<br/>7.1 Ascertaining whether a sewage treatment infrastructure project has potential to be developed on PPP basis (defining the conception) 52<br/>7.2 Transaction Phase 55<br/>7.3 Financing Structure 56<br/>7.4 Legal and Regulatory framework for enabling a Pro- PPP environment for sewage treatment infrastructure projects 56<br/>7.5 How can government foster early commencement of such HAM based sewage treatment infrastructure project 57<br/>7.6 Management Phase 58<br/>Chapter: 8 Deliverable of the thesis study 59<br/>Chapter: 9 Referencing 64<br/> |
