Development of Bus terminal on PPP mode : case study of Lal Darwaja Bus terminal, Ahmedabad (Softcopy is also available) (Record no. 55017)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 06861nam a2200181Ia 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 180908s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und|| |
| 082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER | |
| Classification number | MIED TH-0116 |
| Item number | KIN |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Kini, Sanjay J. (PT301716) |
| 245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Development of Bus terminal on PPP mode : case study of Lal Darwaja Bus terminal, Ahmedabad (Softcopy is also available) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2018 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | vi,x,83p.,5sheets |
| 505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
| Formatted contents note | CONTENTS<br/>Acknowledgement v<br/>Abstract vi<br/>1. Introduction 1<br/>1.1 Need for the Study 1<br/>1.2 Objective of the Study 1<br/>1.3 Scope of Work 1<br/>1.4 Study Site 2<br/>1.4.1 Negative Externality of this demand 3<br/>1.4.2 Positive Externality of this demand 3<br/>1.4.3 Problems faced by the area in and around the area in the immediate vicinity 3<br/>1.4.4 Effect of the Upcoming Ahmedabad Metro on the Bus Terminal 6<br/>1.5 Public Private Partnership (PPP) in Bus Terminal Development 8<br/>2. Case Studies 9<br/>2.1 Amritsar Case Study 9<br/>2.1.1 Salient features of the PPP model bring implemented 9<br/>2.1.2 Advantages of this model 10<br/>2.1.3 Disadvantages of this model 10<br/>2.1.4 Project Features 10<br/>2.1.5 Risk Sharing Framework 11<br/>2.1.5.1 Conditions Precedent Stage 12<br/>2.1.5.2 Construction Stage 12<br/>2.1.5.3 Operation & Maintenance Stage 13<br/>2.1.5.4 Other Risks 14<br/>2.1.6 Positives of the project 14<br/>2.1.7 Drawbacks of the project 14<br/>2.2 Alambagh Bus Terminal Case Study, Lucknow 15<br/>2.2.1 Salient Features of the Model 15<br/>2.2.2 Advantages of this model 16<br/>2.2.3 Disadvantages of this model 16<br/>2.2.4 Project Features 16<br/>2.2.5 Risk Sharing Framework 17<br/>2.2.5.1 Conditions Precedent Stage 18<br/>2.2.5.2 Construction Stage 18<br/>2.2.5.3 Operation & Maintenance Stage 19<br/>2.2.5.4 Other Risks 19<br/>2.2.6 Positives of the Project 20<br/>2.2.7 Drawbacks of the project 20<br/>2.3 Ranip Bus Terminal Case Study, Ahmedabad 20<br/>2.3.1 Salient Features of the Model 20<br/>2.3.2 Project Features 21<br/>2.3.3 Risk Sharing Framework 22<br/>2.3.3.1 Construction Stage 22<br/>2.3.3.2 Operation & Maintenance Stage 23<br/>2.3.3.3 Other Risks 23<br/>2.3.4 Positives of the Project 24<br/>2.3.5 Drawbacks of the project 24<br/>2.4 Summary of the Case Studies 24<br/>3. Schematic Design of the facility 26<br/>3.1 Scope of the design 26<br/>3.2 Space Allocation 26<br/>3.2.1 Parking Space 26<br/>3.2.2 Office Space and Retail Spaces 27<br/>3.2.3 Budget Hotel Space 27<br/>3.2.4 Bus Terminal Space 27<br/>3.3 Space Calculations 28<br/>3.4 Schematic Drawings 28<br/>4 Financial Feasibility Analysis of Various PPP Models 29<br/>4.1 PPP Models taken up for analysis 29<br/>4.2 Basic Assumptions 29<br/>4.2.1 Depreciation Rate 30<br/>4.2.2 Means of Finance 30<br/>4.2.3 Macroeconomic Costs 30<br/>4.3 Only Lease Rental Model 31<br/>4.3.1 Salient Features of the Only Lease Rental Model. 31<br/>4.3.2 Project Cost 32<br/>4.3.3 Operating and Maintenance (O&M) costs 33<br/>4.3.4 Profit-Loss Statement- Only Lease Rental Model 33<br/>4.3.5 Concessionaire’s Cash-Flow Statement 33<br/>4.3.6 AMTS’s Cash-Flow Statement 34<br/>4.3.7 Breakeven Analysis for Only Lease Rental Model 35<br/>4.3.7.1 Breakeven keeping the concession period dynamic 36<br/>4.3.7.2 Breakeven keeping the lease premium payable to AMTS dynamic 37<br/>4.3.8 Conclusions from the Only Lease Rental Model 39<br/>4.4 Upfront Premium Only 40<br/>4.4.1 Salient Features of the Upfront Premium Only Model 40<br/>4.4.2 Project Cost 40<br/>4.4.3 Operating and Maintenance (O&M) costs 41<br/>4.4.4 Profit-Loss Statement- Upfront Premium only 41<br/>4.4.5 Concessionaire’s Cash-Flow Statement 42<br/>4.4.6 AMTS’s Cash-Flow Statement 43<br/>4.4.7 Breakeven Analysis for Upfront Premium Only Model 44<br/>4.4.7.1 Breakeven for the Pessimistic Scenario 45<br/>4.4.7.2 Breakeven for the Optimistic Scenario 46<br/>4.4.7.3 Concessionaire’s Breakeven keeping the concession Period Dynamic-Probabilistic Scenario 47<br/>4.4.7.4 AMTS Breakeven keeping the concession Period Dynamic-Probabilistic Scenario 47<br/>4.4.8 Conclusions from the upfront premium only 48<br/>4.5 Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Model 49<br/>4.5.1 Salient Features of the Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Model 49<br/>4.5.2 Project Cost 50<br/>4.5.3 Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Cost 51<br/>4.5.4 Profit-Loss Statement- Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Model 51<br/>4.5.5 Concessionaire’s Cash Flow Statement- Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Model 52<br/>4.5.6 AMTS’s Cash-Flow Statement- Upfront Premium+ Lease Rental Model 52<br/>4.5.7 Breakeven Analysis for Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Only Model 53<br/>4.5.7.1 Breakeven for the Pessimistic Scenario 54<br/>4.5.7.2 Breakeven for the Optimistic Scenario 55<br/>4.5.7.3 Concessionaire’s and AMTS’s Breakeven keeping the concession Period Dynamic-Probabilistic Scenario 56<br/>4.5.8 Conclusions from the upfront premium + Lease rental only 56<br/>4.6 Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Model+ % share in the revenue 57<br/>4.6.1 Salient Features of the Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Model+ % share in the revenu 57<br/>4.6.2 Project Cost 58<br/>4.6.3 Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Cost 59<br/>4.6.4 Profit-Loss Statement- Upfront Premium+ Lease Rental + % Share in the revenue Model59<br/>4.6.5 Concessionaire’s Cash Flow Statement- Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Model + % Share in the revenue 60<br/>4.6.6 AMTS’s Cash-Flow Statement- Upfront Premium+ Lease Rental + % share in the revenue Model 60<br/>4.6.7 Breakeven Analysis for Upfront Premium + Lease Rental + % Share in the revenue Model 61<br/>4.6.7.1 Concessionaire’s and AMTS’s Breakeven- Upfront Premium + Lease Rental + % Share in the revenue Model 62<br/>4.6.7.2 Effect of % occupancy on the lease rental and upfront premium for the most probable scenario 63<br/>4.6.8 Conclusions from the upfront premium + Lease rental + % Share in the revenue Model 63<br/>4.7 Summary of the four models 64<br/>4.7.1 Summary of the four Models- Pessimistic Scenario 64<br/>4.7.2 Summary of the four Models-Optimistic Scenario 67<br/>4.7.3 Risk Sharing Framework: Upfront Premium + Lease Rental Model 69<br/>4.8 Hybrid Annuity Model (Future) 71<br/>4.8.1 Features of the Hybrid Annuity Model-Lal Darwaja Bus Terminal Case 71<br/>4.8.2 Project Cost-Concessionaire- Hybrid Annuity Model 72<br/>4.8.3 Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Cost-Hybrid Annuity Model 73<br/>4.8.4 Profit Loss Statement-Hybrid Annuity Model 73<br/>4.8.5 Concessionaire’s Cash Flow Statement- Hybrid Annuity Model 74<br/>4.8.6 AMTS’s Cash Flow Statement- Hybrid Annuity Model 74<br/>4.8.7 Breakeven Analysis for Hybrid Annuity Model 75<br/>4.8.7.1 Breakeven Analysis- Effect of % share in revenue on the feasibility 75<br/>4.8.7.1 Breakeven Analysis- Effect on concession period for 30% share in revenue 76<br/>4.8.7.2 Breakeven Analysis- Effect on concession period for 40% share in revenue 77<br/>4.8.8 Risk Sharing Framework: Hybrid Annuity Model 78<br/>4.8.9 Conclusions from the Hybrid Annuity Model 79<br/>5. Conclusions 80<br/>6. Recommendations 81<br/>References 82<br/>Annexure 83<br/><br/> |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Patel, Rajnikant (Guide) |
| 890 ## - Country | |
| Country | India |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | 2016 Batch |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | FT-PG |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | Infrastructure Engineering Design |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection code | Withdrawn status | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Source of acquisition | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Faculty of Technology | CEPT Library | CEPT Library | 08/09/2018 | Faculty of Technology | MIED TH-0116 KIN | 019891 | 08/09/2018 | 08/09/2018 | Thesis |