Study on prequalification criteria adopted for contracotr selection on construction projects (Also available on CD) (Record no. 54899)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 03916nam a2200169Ia 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 180822s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und|| |
| 082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER | |
| Classification number | B TH-0763 |
| Item number | SHA |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Shah, Jaishil (UC5113) |
| 245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Study on prequalification criteria adopted for contracotr selection on construction projects (Also available on CD) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2018 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | vii,viii,57,2p.,CD-ROM |
| 505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
| Formatted contents note | CONTENTS<br/>CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1<br/>1.1 Background 1<br/>1.2 Need 1<br/>1.3 Research Questions 1<br/>1.4 Objective 1<br/>1.5 Scope 1<br/>1.6 Research Methodology 2<br/>1.6.1 Literature review: 2<br/>1.6.2 Data collection: 2<br/>1.6.3 Data analysis: 2<br/>1.7 Timeline of Study 3<br/>1.8 Limitations 3<br/>CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 5<br/>2.1 Process of Contractor Selection 5<br/>2.2 Initial Review Process 5<br/>2.2.1 Registration process 5<br/>2.2.2 Pre-qualification (two bid system): 6<br/>2.2.3 Post-qualification: 8<br/>2.2.4 Shortlisting: 8<br/>2.3 Method’s For Bid Evaluation 8<br/>2.3.1 Least cost based: 8<br/>2.3.2 Highest quality based: 8<br/>2.3.3 Quality cum cost based (QCBS): 8<br/>2.4 Selection Criteria 8<br/>2.4.1 Selection criteria to evaluate the competence of the contractor 9<br/>2.5 Advantages of Selection Criteria 11<br/>2.6 Prevalent Selection Criteria 12<br/>2.7 Documentary evidence 12<br/>CHAPTER 3: DATA COLLECTION AND OBSERVATIONS 15<br/>3.1 Methodology for Data Collection 15<br/>3.1.1 Primary data 15<br/>3.1.2 Secondary data 15<br/>3.1.3 Selection of case studies 15<br/>3.2 Findings of Case Studies 17<br/>3.2.1 Criteria’s for contractor’s selection for the projects with EPC contracts 17<br/>3.2.2 Criteria for Contractor’s selection for the project with cost plus percentage contract 21<br/>3.2.3 Criteria for contractor’s selection for the projects with item rate contracts 25<br/>3.2.4 Criteria for Contractor’s selection for the projects with DBFOT contracts 27<br/>3.3 Comparison of pre-qualification criteria listed in various funding agency’s guidelines 30<br/>3.4 Primary Data Collection 31<br/>3.4.1 Sample size determination 31<br/>3.4.2 Key findings from the interview: 32<br/>CHAPTER 4: DATA ANALYSIS 35<br/>4.1 Similarity Variation Analysis 35<br/>4.1.1 Similarity variation analysis among case studies for different type of contracts 35<br/>4.1.2 Similarity variation analysis among case studies for different type of projects 38<br/>4.1.3 Similarity variation analysis among guidelines of various funding agencies 39<br/>4.1.4 Similarity variation analysis among case studies and guidelines of funding agencies 40<br/>4.2 Major Findings from Similarity Variation Analysis 42<br/>4.2.1 Findings from the case study 42<br/>4.2.2 Findings from guidelines of various funding agencies 43<br/>4.3 Gap Analysis 43<br/>4.3.1 Gap analysis among case studies for different type of contracts 43<br/>4.3.2 Gap analysis among case studies for different type of projects 45<br/>4.4 Relation across Responses from Client, Contractor & Consultants by Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. 47<br/>4.5 Relation within Responses from Client, Contractor & Consultants by Spearman Brown’s Constant 47<br/>4.6 Relative Importance Index (RII) for opinion Survey 47<br/>4.6.1 Relative Importance Index for Prequalification Criteria 48<br/>4.7 Standard Deviation among opinion of various respondents 48<br/>4.8 Method of Evaluation for Selection of Contractor 49<br/>CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION 53<br/>CHAPTER 6: RECOMMENDATIONS 55<br/><br/><br/> |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Shah, Reshma (Guide) |
| 890 ## - Country | |
| Country | India |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | 2013 Batch |
| 891 ## - Topic | |
| Topic | FT-UG |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection code | Withdrawn status | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Source of acquisition | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Faculty of Technology | CEPT Library | CEPT Library | 22/08/2018 | Faculty of Technology | B TH-0763 SHA | 019820 | 22/08/2018 | 22/08/2018 | Thesis |