Study of contestations of urban commons : the case of lakes of Bangalore (Also available on CD) (Record no. 51602)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03478nam a2200157Ia 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180516s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und||
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number P TH-1511
Item number BEN
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Benjamin, Mathews John
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Study of contestations of urban commons : the case of lakes of Bangalore (Also available on CD)
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2013
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent xiv,139p.,CD-ROM
505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note Contents Abbreviations ix Executive Summary x 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Problem identification 1 1.3 Research question 5 1.4 Aim 5 1.5 Objectives 5 1.6 Study framework 6 1.7 Limitations of study 7 1.8 Research methodology 7 1.9 Analytical framework 8 1.10 Justification for site study 9 2. Emerging Theories on Urban Commons 11 2.1 Basic concepts and definitions 11 2.2 Property Rights and Ownership Pattern 13 2.3 Commons' Dilemmas 14 2.4 Institutional Dynamics 16 2.4.1 Olson's Collective Action Theory 17 2.4.2 Buchanan and Tullock's Cost Approach Theory 18 2.4.3 Oakerson Model 18 2.4.4 McClusky's The Theory of Margin 19 2.5 Design Principles Illustrated by Long-Enduring Common-Pool Resource Institutions(E. Ostrom 1990) 20 2.6 Social theories on the Appropriation of Public Space 24 2.7 Lawrence Lessig: A framework for analyzing control and freedom in urban public space 25 2.8 Inferences drawn 26 3. Conceptualizing The Role Of Urban Commons 30 3.1 What are Urban commons? 30 3.2 Characteristics of urban commons 30 3.3 Difference between Traditional commons versus urban commons 32 4. Lakes as urban commons: The case of Bangalore 34 4.1 Introduction 34 4.2 Historic context 37 4.3 Advantages of a well established hydrological system 39 4.4 How did they decay? 40 4.5 Institutional framework 42 4.6 Public Interest Litigation 49 4.7Sample cases selected 49 4.8 Differences between publicly managed commons and privately managed commons 51 5. Publicly Managed Lakes 53 5.1 Sankey Tank 53 5.1.1 Historic context 53 5.1.2 Limnology study 54 5.1.3 Present day 55 5.1.4 Resource characteristics 55 5.1.5 Landuse characteristics 57 5.1.6 Institutional framework/Property rights 58 5.1.7 Resource utility(uses/users) 59 5.2 Kaikondanahalli Lake 62 5.2.1 Historic context 62 5.2.2 Limnology study 63 5.2.3 Present day 63 5.2.4 Resource characteristics 64 5.2.5 Landuse characteristics 66 5.2.6 Institutional framework/Property rights 67 5.2.7 Resource utility(uses/users) 68 5.3 Puttenahalli Lake 71 5.3.1 Historic context 71 5.3.2 Limnology study 71 5.3.3 Present day 72 5.3.4 Resource characteristics 74 5.3.5 Landuse characteristics 75 5.3.6 Institutional framework/Property rights 76 5.3.7 Resource utility(uses/users) 77 6. Privately managed lakes 80 6.1 Hebbal Lake 80 6.1.1 Historic context 80 6.1.2 Limnology study 81 6.1.3 Present day 82 6.1.4 Resource characteristics 83 6.1.5 Landuse Characteristics 84 6.1.7 Resource utility(uses/users) 88 6.2 Nagawara Lake 91 6.2.1 Historic context 91 6.2.2 Limnology study 91 6.2.3 Present day 92 6.2.4 Resource characteristics 92 6.2.5 Landuse Charateristics 94 6.2.6 Institutional framework/Property rights 94 6.2.7 Resource utility(uses/users) 97 7. Analysis 100 7.1 Comparative analysis 100 Findings of study 116 7.3 Collective Action as framework for managing lakes 118 7.4 Conclusion 120 Annexure 123 References 136
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Parthasarathy, R. (Guide)
891 ## - Topic
Topic 2010 Batch
891 ## - Topic
Topic FP-PG
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Collection code Withdrawn status Home library Current library Date acquired Source of acquisition Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Faculty of Planning   CEPT Library CEPT Library 10/08/2013 Faculty of Planning P TH-1511 BEN 011548 18/05/2018 18/05/2018 Thesis
Excel To HTML using codebeautify.org Sheet Name :- Location Chart
Location Chart Basement 1 (B1) Class No. 600 - 649, 660 - 699
(B1) :Mezzanine 1 Class No. 700 - 728
(B1) :Mezzanine 2 Class No. 728.1 - 799, 650 - 659, Reference Books, Faculty work
Basement 2 (B2) Class No. 000 - 599, 800-999
Basement 3 (B3) (Please Inquire at the Counter for resources) Theses, Students' works, Bound Journals, Drawings, Atlas, Oversize Books, Rare Books, IS codes, Non-book Materials